Gemma 4 is overall very nice, but I think one of the lower layers just got tired of reading the documentation I was asking it to look things up in.
The 7.0 text says " la l a l la de la lL de l de l".
Actually, the a l l lL lLL de l l l l de l lLL lL deL is a mistake in my thought process.
The text says: " la l de l la lLL la l de l lL de la deL".
Looking at the 7.0 text: "L a l a la de l de l l la l a deL l".
Okay, let's look at line 735: " Some of those substructures are defined here…
Random "la de da" nonsense when it should be reading a reference document. There's a teenager in there, somewhere, I'm sure of it.
